Whoa! There he goes. Lit the fuse and boom.
Go on Cofty. Ram it down their throats.
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
Whoa! There he goes. Lit the fuse and boom.
Go on Cofty. Ram it down their throats.
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
Cofty, you keep contradicting yourself. It has been clearly noted that you have said over and over that the "proof" is still coming... yet to be found etc. Then you say "it is in".
Which is it? Stop contradicting yourself.
And by the way, it's all in type throughout the thread, so don't bother to tell us it isn't there. We can read.
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
Nimble duck: It's a foregone conclusion that it is accepted in the Bible Belt that we all descend from a common ancestor. How you have made this an issue, and made it supposed proof of evolution is breathtaking.
Each in its own species.
The day a scientist turns a dog into a cat, I will listen.
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
What I would be interested in hearing from NImble Duck et al is some detail on what (if anything) he does agree with and what he doesn't.
ND: You asked, so I will answer.
I've seen very little serious and specific counter-arguments to any of Cofty's posts.
ND: I have NOT tried to prove anything, so the oness is not on me to provide specific arguments. I have merely pointed out the gaping holes in the evolutionist position. I have merely asked for answers to the big questions. I have pointed out that evolutionists DO NOT follow the scientific method. They have no experiments, never mind repeatable ones, that provide a resultant in favor of evolution. They always say "soon we will have it" and state the unproven as fact. I have merely, and correctly objected to this unscientific nonsense.
Does Duck agree with the concept that an animal may adapt and evolve?
ND: This is a non sequiter. "Adapt" and "evolve" are completely different things. "Adapt" is to change within a set of defined parameters. "Evolve" is to develop entirely new parameters. To put these two entirely different things together is to confuse the issue.
Does he accept any evidence of evolution being observed?
ND. LOL what evidence?
Does he consider all gene mutations to be unable to produce positive and sustainable change?
ND: Where is the scientific proof that a gene mutation was ever beneficial?
Cofty has been clear that he considers the statement that "all living things descended from a common ancestor" is a fact. He has presented numerous lines of argument to back that up.
ND: Now, this one baffles me. This is a JW forum. Supposedly, everyone here comes from a Bible background. The Genesis account, that we all learned, speaks of all mankind coming from a common ancestor, Adam. It's a foregone conclusion that it is accepted in the Bible Belt that we all descend from a common ancestor. How you have made this an issue, and made it supposed proof of evolution is breathtaking.
Please write better stuff.
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
"One hundred million years ago, the first unicorn descended from the mountain top, probably with the tooth fairy on its back. Scientists are sure of this probably, and we will soon find proof. This makes it a fact."
Its in quotes. That makes it scientific.
Just gotta get it peer reviewed and rubber stamped by Bill Nye the science guy.
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17987-how-life-evolved-10-steps-to-the-first-cells/
Anyone who wants to read the material that the evolutionist mind feeds on, have a look. The first point assumes water without any attempt at explaining where the hell the water came from.
There's no scientific method followed, to demonstrate their 'repeatable' experiments and results. It's all just crap they printed neatly inside the borders.
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
I stated that evolution is a fact. I have never stated that any particular hypothesis regarding abiogenesis is a fact.
The origin of life PROBABLY began in alkaline hydrothermal vents. The answer may turn out to be elsewhere.
Do you read what you write? For the love of unGod man, give it a try. "The answer MAY turn out to be"... you might fool the gullible with this kind of clap trap, but a thinking mind is in no danger with your nonsense. All your "proof" is still in the future, and you are a hangin' today.
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
Life - all the way to the first cell - probably originated in alkaline hydrothermal vents.
This is typical evolutionist BS. They state something as a "fact" and then commence to make liberal use of these adverbs.
This is how you form your, "I'm-positive-I'm-right" sentence???
Cofty: Your Honor, the accused is GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY and I will probably have proof someday as my investigation "is still young". I propose we hang the accused today and find the proof later, at some future date."
Cofty, the Bernie Madoff of evolution
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
Whether he is contradicting himself is beyond the point. It's irrelevant.
AH... NO, I DON'T THINK SO.
What's relevant is that you're lying by misquoting him. (And I literally—in the literal sense of "literally"—almost never accuse others of lying... It's extremely rare for me to do that.) He did say that any detailed account of evolution of any biochemical or cellular system is wishful speculation,
You here quote the exact same words as did I and then accuse me of lying. Your expression is absurd. UNTHINK. So, what??? it's not "wishful thinking" anymore because we "will" find proof that backs up your evolutionary BS.
...but in the next sentence he says that such an account is yet to be discovered—that it will be discovered.
How can anyone, in the present, base all their conclusions on supposed proof that is wishfully arriving "soon"... in the still future. That would be comical if it wasn't so dreadfully nuts.
Maybe it will come with the Watchtower Armageddon?? LOL
And you placed the word "will" in italic. It's the fool who thinks he can predict the future, what "will" or "will" not be.
Absurd. Non-reasoning garbage.
Yes, yes yes... evolution is a "fact" and we will find the proof soon.#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
It's not a misquote. What is quoted from his words belies the context. He is a contradicting himself.